KicksGuide
Home
Chat
Artist Series
Top Rated Shoes
Top KG Artists
Top KG Renderings
Artist Directory
Timeline of Basketball Shoes
Clearance Items
adidas Shoes
Jordan Shoes
Nike Shoes
Reebok Shoes
a3 vs Shox
adidas a3 Forum
adidas Superstar Ultra
adidas TMAC III
adidas TMAC IV
adidas TMAC 5
adidas UltraStar
All Star Delight
Alphaproject Jason Petrie
Air Jordan VI
Air Jordan IX
Air Jordan XI
Air Jordan XII Nubuck
Air Jordan XII Flu Game
Air Jordan XVI
Air Jordan XVI Low
Air Jordan XIX Interview
Air Jordan XIX Review
Air Jordan XIX Long Term
Air Jordan 2010
Barkley: King Kong vs Godzilla
Jordan vs Kobe
Jordan Brand Curse
Jumpman Team Flow
K1X Chiefglider
Mark Miner
Nike After Knight
Nike Air Flight Huarache
Nike Air Max 2003
Nike Air Max Uptempo 95
Nike Air Zoom Generation Review
Nike Air Zoom Huarache 2K4
Nike Air Zoom Ultraflight
Nike Lebron II Concept
Nike Lebron IV
Nike Sharkley
Nike Shox VC III
Nike Ultraposite ScarFace
Nike Ultraposite
Reebok Pump 2.0
Reebok Question
Reebok Throwdown
Reebok Yao Concept
Ryan Holler adidas Portland Trip
Ryan Holler adidas LA Trip
Shox BB4 vs Flight 2K3
State of Reebok
SuperStar Ultra vs VC III
Ultra Luxury Performance Shootout
UNC Home Sweet Home
Zenith Chance
2007 Design of the Year
2006 Shoe of the Year
2006 Retro Shoe of the Year
2006 Artist of the Year
2006 Design of the Year
2005 Artist of the Year
2004 Design of the Year
2003 Shoe of the Year
2003 Luxury Shoe of the Year
2003 Performance Shoe of the Year
2003 Retro Shoe of the Year
2003 Best Low Top
2003 Collector's Choice



Email Address:
Password:

New User? Forgot Password?
 
Jordan VI Infared
Jordan 2010 Stealth
Jordan IX Powder


Reebok XBeam Throwdown

(Continued ...)



      Reebok claims "the Throwdown features an X-Beam TPU midsole plate for lightweight and flexibility, a low to ground look and feel, and a 3D visual appearance". Well, we can agree with the visual appeal but we must digress to the low to the ground claim. The XBeam is a great alternative to other technology available on the market such as Shox and A3. It provides 80-90% of the experience but at a fraction of the expense. Yet, neither the Shox nor the A3 technology is anything close to being low to the ground in terms of look or feel. The XBeam is no exception. In fact, the biggest knock we have against it is the fact that it feels HIGH off the ground, almost unstable at times due to the higher center of gravity.

      Cushioning feel is solid. It is able to absorb any kind of impact w/out fear of bottoming out. The only other weakness we could see is the responsiveness of the shoe. Once the XBeam platform absorbs the shocks, there’s no feedback back to the foot. The player will feel isolated from the court and while that may be a good thing for some, performance-oriented buyers will frown. In this aspect, we’d have to say the Shox easily have the best energy return system (Boing anyone?) on the market, with A3 following second and the XBeam lags behind in 3rd.

      The Throwdown could also benefit more from an inner lacing system. After a few week of wear, we felt there’s constant shifting in the forefoot area during high level competition. The first row of laces is placed a tad too high and does not allow a good snug fit for players with narrow feet. We may recommend even going down half a size to accommodate this.

      Take a look at the bottom of the Throwdown. The sole design is practically identical to the XBeam Franchise and provides excellent traction. The groove near the forefoot area allows flexibility when running, jumping and cutting. We also like the design here - goes hand in hand with the upper elements of the shoe.

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next